For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. Jude 1 v 4
As I wrote an Article on my one of many encounters with the Jehovah’s Witnesses the other day it spurned me to look a bit more Into the organisation. I was always aware of the Masonic roots and once looking into them was sure I would have found some symbolism and did. And to my surprise I have read a few websites trying to justify the use of the Symbols, for example, the cross and crown one website says.
Bible Student meaning for the Cross and Crown is taken from the Scriptures where both symbols are given a prominent place. The cross, besides being the instrument used in the death of Christ, is also a metaphor of the trials and persecutions of the believer. (See Matt 16 v 24) The crown is frequently used as a symbol of the glory, honour and immortality granted to Christ and his church for faithfulness in serving God. (See Rev 3 v 21; 2 v 10.) Charles F. Redeker.
but in fact.
“The Cross and Crown may be said to be confined almost exclusively to the historical degrees in Masonry as exemplified in the various orders of knighthood of York and Scottish rites. In Gaul we find the cross to have been a solar symbol when it had equal arms and angles; to the Phoenicians, it was an instrument of sacrifice to their God, Baal; and to the Egyptians, the crux ansata was his symbol of eternal life.” Ray V. Denslow, Masonic Portraits, Transactions of this Missouri Lodge of Research, vol. #29, p.7
If this was the only connection to the Occult one could believe this statement but as you will read it’s not and not by a long shot.
The Jehovah’s witnesses are a group who say they are restoring Christianity to its Origins of back to the Apostolic age. They claim they are searching for a more authentic, Pure, Grassroots feel in short Restorationism their beliefs are in fact distinct from all mainstream Christian denominations.
At this moment in time, the Jehovahs witnesses have a worldwide Membership of over 8 million with a head count at their conventions of over 17 million. If you include the annual memorial Attendance numbers in the region of 20 million have been said to of been recorded.
The Jehovah’s have been taught to go after the quiet the week and the subservient so they will fall into line and not ask too many questions. People who will make good followers, they used to come to my Door and after two occasions of them being not able to answer my questions, well answer after I give them a reply to their standard answers more to the point. They don’t come around anymore I read somewhere that I will be put down as a non-conformer or whatever Terminology they use.
The thing is people who say are “Religous” and don’t get their questions answered by the Priests or Ministers might succumb to the Witnesses as they seem to have all the Answers. Answers they might have but correct Answers I’m not too sure and it might appeal to a lot as the Witnesses have a negative stance when it comes to the governments of the World. Their almost hatred for the Military and Holidays that we celebrate in the west as they are Pagan in Origin with a sprinkle of Christianity might appeal to the layman. But before we get into how bad their beliefs and Translation of the Bible is let’s look more into who they are.
WHO THEY ARE.
Jehovah’s Witnesses had their origins in the “Bible Student movement“, which developed in the United States in the 1870s among followers of Christian Restorationist minister Charles Taze Russell (February 16, 1852 – October 31, 1916) who was a freemason and out of that came the “Zion watchtower society” on December 15th 1884.
Joseph Franklin Rutherford November 8, 1869 – January 8, 1942,) the 2nd President of the Movement was first contacted in 1894 when he was twenty-four by two travelling peddlers for the Watchtower Society who were then called colporteurs. He bought some of their books and wrote an appreciative letter to the Society and yet he was not baptised a JW until twelve years later in 1906 at age 36. Then a mere one year later he went off to the Society’s headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, to serve as legal counsellor. Proclaimers notes that he was admitted to the U.S. Supreme Court bar in May 1909.
After the death of the Society’s founding President Charles Taze Russell on October 31, 1916, He stepped in and when he did he restructured the movement and made more than a few doctrinal changes the name Jehovah’s witness arrived to stay in 1931 this was a mark to distance itself from the other Bible study groups and a move from the Legacy of Russel and his traditions.
ARE THEY REALLY CHRISTIAN
As Russel was someone to say Christianity had moved from its roots and had become fundamentally corrupt. While he said in one breath that he set out to restore the faith to be more in line with the early church. In the other breath, he made scripture that corrupt in their meaning. That he had to have a watchtower society to explain the doctrinal changes that they claim are a deeper revelation from Jehovah himself and his Angels.
As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Galatians 1 v 9
And kept in place by a governing body that cannot be challenged by the laity and their authority is in Par with scripture itself. If any member studies any other books other than that chosen by the governing body the “watch tower” there is a chance they could be shunned. This was put in place from Russel and as we have already seen been changed somewhat with Rutherford.
We know that they claim to be a Christian denomination but one of the first things you will hear is that JESUS CHRIST is not God nor the son of God nor equal with the father. Their ludicrous claims are that Jesus and the Archangel Micheal are one in the same that when Jesus was in the Flesh Michael ceased to exist. That Michael is the Pre-existing Christ.
Jesus is “The King of Kings” the “Lord of Lords“not a Chief Prince lets look at when Michael is contending for the body with Satan.
Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, “The LORD rebuke thee“. Jude 1 v 9
We see hear that Michael hasn’t the authority to rebuke Satan by himself he says “The LORD rebuke thee” he doesn’t say I rebuke you and when Jesus says.
“For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day”.Matthew 12 v 8
Jesus Says he is the Son of Man Lord an angel cannot except worship
And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servent, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. Revelation 19 v 10
Angels are Fellow servants and can’t except worship according to Blood bought Believers and the Bible Michael is never called Lord in the old Testament you get Angels of the Lord but not referred to as Lord. And now for the Cherry on Top of the Watchtower Revelations, it’s a cracker they say Jesus is Abbadon the Angel from the bottomless pit in Revelation 9 who is also called Appolyon who is Satan.
Revelation 9:7, God’s people are represented by locusts. The modern-day locust army is none other than the military force of Jehovah’s anointed locusts, now joined by some 5,600,000 of Jesus’ ‘other sheep.’ (John 10:16)” turn to Revelation 9:11 and you will see that the leader of this “locust” army is “Apollyon.” Strong’s Greek definition of Apollyon (See number #623) is that of “a destroyer (i,e. Satan).” So in essence, by claiming that their people are represented by the “locust army” of Revelation, the Society is admitting that their people are being led by Satan Himself! May 1, 1998 Watchtower page 9-10
Jesus is Abaddon and Apollyon:
In “United Against Nations in the Valley of Decision” “When Jesus was on earth as a man, he was a Hebrew, and now in his capacity as Jehovah’s royal Executioner he is called by the Hebrew name Abad’don, which means Destruction. (Job 26:6; 28:22; 31:12; 12:23; 14:19) In the Greek in which the inspired Christian Scriptures were written his similar title is Apollyon, which means Destroyer.” Watchtower 12/1/1961, pp. 719 see pp. 717-720
“This is a campaign extraordinaire, one that will be memorialised for all time. Wave upon wave of insects, most prominently locusts, devastate the land. What does that mean? Revelation 9:1-12 also speaks of a plague of locusts, sent forth by Jehovah under a “king, the angel of the abyss,” who is none other than Jesus Christ. His names Abaddon (Hebrew) and Apollyon (Greek) mean “destruction” and “Destroyer.” These locusts picture the anointed remnant of Christians who, now in the Lord’s day go forth to devastate Christendom’s pastures by completely exposing false religion and proclaiming Jehovah’s vengeance upon it. May 1 1992 Watchtower
To say Jesus and Satan are one in the same is just Totally wrong in every sense of the word its not even on the Level of heresy is Blasphemy saying Jesus is one and the same as Satan a fallen Angel is close to the Sin of Matthew 12 when the Pharisees said that Jesus used Satan to cast out Satan.
And This my friend is where they cross the barrier is their echoes of some other belief system here “YES” there is you guessed Correctly Freemasons (if you didn’t I’m glad you are learning truth) this belief Ladies and Gentlemen is the same and it’s what much of the secret societies are trying to push to bring in the One World Religion.to say Christ is Lucifer is the same as saying Adoni is Lucifer and again who says this.
Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately, Adonay is also god. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods; darkness being necessary for light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive…Albert Pike
Although this is debated the ‘Luciferian’ doctrine gets verified from an unusual source. Dr. Lester Sumrall in volume two of his teaching manuals ‘Demonology and Deliverance’.Pike also equates Lucifer as the Light-bearer although Lucifer was Son of the Dawn and it means son of the howling Boisterous one. Not Son of the Morning and in Revelations, a different word is used for Jesus being the Morning star.
“Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendours intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not!” Morals and Dogma
Do we have a raised eyebrow..!! if I were to tell you that the “Rothschilds” support the Jehovah witnesses they fund them No didn’t think so? From what we have found out so far and will find out before the Article is done this come’s no surprise that a Luciferian family who on some Level rule the rest Russell’s included ( read on ) even if they are a front for the Black nobility or a front for the Powers and Principalities.
They receive this money through the B’nai Birth foundation a society that formed 173 years ago on October the 13th 1843.This Society is like the rest a cake of the Occult with the Icing of freemasonry and when the money was being ploughed into the Witnesses and Eugenics was on the increase they started release scripture aimed at minorities to appease the Rothschild agenda of thinning the Herd.
THE OCCULT AND RUSSEL AND RUTHERFORD.
For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was anything kept secret, but that it should come abroad. Mark 4 v 22
To find anything of any interest on Charles T Russell is hard at Best about his pre-Jahovas days. What we do know is that he was a “Restoration Minister” from Pennsylvania and he was known to of had a very colourful a Heinz 57 of a spiritual Past ( reminiscent of Blavatsky). He was said to have immersed himself in the eastern mystery religions and was fond of Buddism, Hinduism and even was said to of studied Taoism.
He was said to of been an outspoken Zionist, The return of the Jews to the homeland and the Birth of modern Zionism in 1897 was central to his belief system. Like other Preachers that are Jew Centred It was Russell’s message to the Jews “that they need not bother with conversion to Christianity, being already chosen by Jehovah, they need only resettle in their land and receive their blessing”.
This frame of mind was certainly there from his Freemason roots and the Jehovah’s Witnesses will hotly contend this to be untrue you can still find records of Charles T Russell being a member of a Templer mason, York rite lodge in Allegheny Pennsylvania with the Cross and crown being a mark of the Knight Templer now I think we know exactly what order he was involved in. That’s just the tip His family are part of the ruling elite and are centre in the Illuminati bloodlines the Name Russel has long had a connection to freemasons and other secret societies. So no surprise that the Rothschilds are there supplying the Jehovas witnesses with funding via the B’nai Birth foundation. Russel himself at times would publically deny that he was a freemason
“Although I have never been a Mason … Something I do seems to be the same as Masons do, I don’t know what it is, but they often give me all kinds of grips and I give them back, thin I tell them I don’t know anything about it except just a few grips that have come to me naturally..” Special 1913 Convention Report of the Internal Bible Students, “The Temple of Gods” pages 120-127.
Russell is buried next to the Greater Pittsburgh Masonic Center. And if he wasn’t a freemason seems a bit strange the watchtower allowing a pyramid to be on top of his grave
He was the Nephew of William Huntington Russel the co-founder of the Yale society Also known as the “skull and Bones” society with some of his Doctrines and his eastern esoteric appetite there is an almost Rosecruton connection I think the crown in the cross gives that away.
Charles was also fond of Channelling yes you read correct Channelling he would as well as others contact what he thought were good Angels. The outcome of this was the book named “Angels and woman” the witnesses are quick to say that they don’t have anything to do with the teachings of Russell they call it Old Light. Russel came by a book named seola it was dictated in 1888 under the direction of a Pre-flood fallen angel ( Russel says repentant). the book was then edited by this medium and once done sold on as “Angels and Woman” and advertised in the “Golden age magazine” known now as the “Awake”. The Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses is the ruling council of Jehovah’s Witnesses and Samuel F. Herd is a member and promoted the book “Angels and Women” in his talk “Fear of Giants” in 1983. He called it a
“fascinating book, once you pick it up you cant put it down without reading it from cover to cover”! He also mentions that Russell wrote the foreword of the book and that it can be found in the Gilead library.”
And this is how the New World Order was birthed by John Dee (13 July 1527 – December 1608) occult philosopher, and advisor to Queen Elizabeth I. He did the same as Russel he was in Constant contact with Fallen Angels “Enochian Magic”. Russel encouraged his “occult” followers the members of his “study groups” to read the book Angels and woman and he did so saying that it contained Biblical truths as the name suggests it was probably a take on Genesis 6 v4.
Following on from that we have the “Watchtower magazine” and that name is also of Dubious origin being well known in the Hermetic occult practices, in other words, “Enochian magic” the watch tower was a station of four spirit guardians you guessed it the “Watchers” the fallen angels of Genesis 6 v 4. and there was a watcher for each direction North, South, East and West this ritual is practised in a lot of the groups from the Golden dawn to witchcraft.
Do you remember the 1996 film the “craft” it’s about four girls who dabble n the Occult this Spell was done in the film as they stood at the beach and called out the 4 directions the ritual in the movie was of a basic nature but they called a Wiccan as a technical adviser on the set and as well as the 4 directions they call Fomalhaut, Aldebaran, Regulus and Antares to coincide with certain stars I remember echoes of this from my involvement in the Pagan lifestyle I was involved in the Movie the “craft” is a cautionary tale of the dangers of the Occult but Hollywood named from the tree witches would make their wand from are responsible for a surge of interest into Wicca the watered down version of witchcraft and it is 100% evil you might think your only doing white magic but before you know it you will be cursing folk and this will Destroy your life please take it from someone who has been there if it wasn’t for Christ I’d be in jail for a long time or dead.
Russel’s date system for armageddon came from the great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt in his book Divine plan of the ages in which he predicted the end of the world in 1914. He used masonic signs and symbols on his books and also on the watchtower magazine. We have already seen that he used the cross and crown he also used the winged sun disk symbols of the Rosicrucian’s and knights templar. Also, we know without a shadow of a doubt that the watchtower is a reference to the Fallen Angels and signifies the stonework of masons.
Now we will have a wee bit on Joseph Franklin Rutherford also known as judge rutherford he stepped into the shoes of Russel. He became the second president of the incorporated watchtower bible and tract society of Pennsylvania. He ended up going in a different direction to Russel and became more in the line of anti-Semitic. However, he did follow in the Occult footsteps and filled Russell boots and brought out the “Golden age magazine” another Occult reference doing the bidding of the Luciferian Rothschilds. The name “Golden age” has its Origin in Crowley’s Thelemic Philosophy of the Golden Dawn the name itself “Golden Dawn” is a reference to the New World Order.
Rutherford claimed Angels enlightened him with God’s interpretation of Scripture. He said invisible spirits transmitted the interpretations, as well as organisation instructions, inaudibly into his mind. Rutherford stated that these claims were not spiritism according to Duane Magnani in 1986 his lecture “Angels of the New Light” at the Witnesses Now for Jesus ex-JW convention in New Ringgold, Pennsylvania. He discussed Rutherford’s claim that what he wrote was not due to the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, but due to angels who transmitted the information telepathically into his mind.
Duane spoke of his research into Rutherford and his beliefs such as their concept of Jehovah as an organism living in the Pleiades, salvation of “honest’ demons, their endorsement of the automatic writing book, “Angels and Women” that we have already spoken of according to a book written by Rutherford n 1933 named the “Preparation” he said that.
Enlightenment proceeds from Jehovah… and is given to the faithful anointed…. the remnant are instructed by the angels of the Lord. The remnant do not hear audible sounds because such is not necessary. Jehovah has provided his own good way to convey thoughts to the minds of his anointed ones. The Preparation page 64
Now the watch tower thinks that only they have the proper interpretation of Scripture and frown upon any outside reading for their followers Rutherford like Russell was involved with and spoke with Fallen Angels and Demons. A quote from the Golden Age magazine.
God uses angels to teach His people now on earth.Golden Age, November 8, 1933, p. 69.
Rutherford said that God used angels to teach the remnant, not the Holy Spirit.and that this stopped in 1918 and from that date, all that was written was from the Angel.
Since we do not practice spiritism, we are free of the domination of demons. The Watchtower, March 15, 1992, p. 20,
As the Holy Spirit is said to of been removed they received the “Truth” from Angels they did this by inaudibly transmitting information and Biblical interpretations into the remnant’s minds. Here is a few more of his statements on this, more words of Rutherford.
Jehovah would employ his power through his angels to put in the minds of his servants to take the course that he would have them take.
God put it into the minds of his people to declare what constitutes Satan’s organization and to serve notice upon each branch thereof…. Jehovah directs his own work, though we hear no audible voices.
This is clearly Spiritism Occult 101 for the Angels to put in the minds of the believers Messages two things come straight to mind here 1. is the witch of Endor as she was the Medium the Hebrew is ob 178 and this was a Bottle a wine skin to be filled and the Witch being the empty bottle to be filled wth the Familiar Spirit and the other is.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Galatians 1 v 8
And this is the claim of Many Mohammed, Joseph Smith Bob Jones with the Angel Emma The Bible does not indicate that Christians are to be enlightened by angelic spirits through thought transference in any way shape or form. As Born Again Believers The Holy spirit is the one who teaches John 14 v 26 guides John 16 v 13 and fills us Ephesians 5 v 18. Being filled with another Spirit according to the Bible is plain as Day its Demons and the Fallen Angels they go around dry places
When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out. Luke 11 v 24
Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: 1 Peter 5 v 8.
DOOR TO DOOR.
Now that we have had a look at who they are and the roots of the Witnesses and it certainly ain’t Christian this Cult has always reminded me of the Cult of the early years named the Alexandrian’s I call then Jehovah of their day they built on the back of a Man named Marcion who was the first to compile the books of the New Testament but he brought Gnosticism into Christianity and threw out what he didn’t like. He believed the God of the new Testament was all about love and in the old, he seen him as this Angry tyrant (he clearly didn’t get it if that was his view).
He also believed God was a dotty demiurge and Sophia was his maker. Origin was Gnostic also and took some of this on board and other Heresies when writing the Alexandrian text that is why time they were Jehovah’s of their day. He wrote a Translation called the Alexandrian Text and that’s where we get all Translation’s from except the King James. But the Jehovah’s have their own Translation called the New World Translation and let’s just say it’s far from any other translation.
William Barclay, a leading Greek scholar, said “it is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest.”
British scholar H.H. Rowley stated, “From beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated….Well, as a backdrop, I was disturbed because they (Watchtower) had misquoted me in support of their translation.” (These words were excerpted from the tape, “Martin and Julius Mantey on The New World Translation”, Mantey is quoted on pages 1158-1159 of the Kingdom interlinear Translation)
Bruce M. Metzger, professor of New Testament at Princeton University, calls the NWT “a frightful mistranslation, Erroneous…pernicious…reprehensible.. If the Jehovah’s Witnesses take this translation seriously, they are polytheists.” (Professor of New Testament Language and Literature)
Work began on December 2, 1947 when the “New World Bible Translation Committee” was formed, composed of Jehovah’s Witnesses who professed to be anointed The complete New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures was released as a single volume in 1961. The translation is said to have 47 Scriptures completely missing and the Biggest attack is on the Divinity of Christ. Here is a few Scriptures on what His Disciples said:-
JESUS IS GOD
He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. John 1 v 41
And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples. Luke 11 v 1
Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. John 1 v 49
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Matthew 16 v 16
Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God. John 6 v 68-69
And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. John 20 v 28.
JESUS SAID ABOUT HIMSELF.
I am the bread of life. John 6 v 48
I am the light of the world. John 8 v 12
I am the door. John 10 v 9
I am the good Shepherd. John 10 v 11
I am the resurrection and the life. John 11 v 35
I am the Way the Truth the Life. John 14 v 6
I am the true vine. John 15 v 1
I personally go by the name the Great I am “God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’ Exodus 3-14 Hebrew :- Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh (exist/was) Ehyeh asher Ehyeh literally translates as
“I Will Be What I Will Be”, Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
John 8 v 58
Verses Jehovah’s use to Deny Jesus as God.
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: Colossians 1:15
They will say Paul says Jesus is the “firstborn” of all “creation.” Paul is saying that Jesus was the very first of all of God’s creations meaning he can’t be God.As we mentioned at the start of this Article to the Religious or untrained Christian this might sound correct
but The word firstborn in Greek is prototokos 4416 Superior, Preeminent in rank It does not mean first created as the Witnesses say. There’s another Greek word for ‘first created’ protoktistos and Paul did not use that word.
Jesus made all things they also add in a few word differences in the next few Verses that when it says all things they give the Impression Jesus Just made some things another bad Translation to back their doctrine of Demons.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1 v 1
They also do a fly move in John 1:1 “the Word was a god,” instead of “the Word was God.“ and “the” is replaced with “a,” and the capital “G” is replaced with a lower case “g.” they will argue their point but it’s a bad translation and the Witnesses also to back this up the last half of 1 John 5:7 is omitted in the New.World.Translation., because it says that the Father, the Word which is Christ in John 1:14, and the Holy Ghost “are one.”
Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. Mark 13 v 31-32
I’ve actually had this one thrown at me and what they say is Jesus here doesn’t know the time when this will happen and only father knows and if Jesus doesn’t know it means he is not the father. First thing here is they don’t Understand that the Godhood is of a triune Nature meaning one source one God in three distinct persons and second is that when Christ became flesh as in he was fully man he had to eat, sleep he had to overcome fear in the Garden before his crucifixion.
But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man. Hebrews 2 v 9
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: Philippians 2 v 6-7
He was also God in the flesh and emptied himself of his Divinity in a sense he became a nobody making him fully man but also fully God minus his Power. When in his ministry he was using the Holy Spirit as Paul says the same Spirit that raised Christ from the Dead is in you Romans 8 v 11 and Christ Himself says you will do greater works than me John 14 v 12.
They Also say that the Holy Spirit is a Force hence relegating him from the Triune Godhead. Every pronoun used in reference to the Spirit is “He” not “It.” The Greek of the New Testament is explicit in confirming the person of the Holy Spirit. Although The word for “Spirit” (pneuma) neither masculine nor feminine but in the scriptures, in John, the masculine pronouns are found as in He, and is used in John 15 v 26 when it says “HE will bear witness of me“. So now we’ve got that bit out the way lets carry on.. a force does not
For it is not ye that speak but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you. Matthew 10 v 20
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. John 16 v 13
Nevertheless, I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. John 16 v 7
TEACH. and TRIUNE all three mentioned.
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. John 14 v 26
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; John 14 v 16
All THREE IN ONE SCRIPTURE
And Jesus, when he was baptised, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Matthew 3 v 16-17
Right, I’ve given some Scriptures covering Christ and His Godship from the Bible and some of the what the witnesses will try and twist. While showing where possible errors in their own translations are. I have some scriptures on the Holy Spirit because although they have other views on a whole host of things. If you show Christ as God and also the Holy Spirit they Don’t know where to turn if they are Genuinely seeking although this is sadly not always the case as they are brainwashed to think everything you say even if they don’t have a reply is wrong so even if you can Shed some doubt on what they believe the major passage I use is John 5
Jesus has healed someone on the Sabbath and the Jews where angry with him and in this passage, Jesus shows that he Also is God as when the Jews keep hassling him Jesus says.
And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day. But Jesus answered them, “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work”.Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. John 5 16-18
he goes on to say
That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth, not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. John 5 v 23
Also John 10
My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand.I and my Father are one.Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me? The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. John 10 v 29-33
These two examples are Good as it isn’t the Jews opinion that Jesus is God or John in his Narration but Christ Himself saying My Father worketh….. then after in Verse 23 he has not only made himself one with the father in verse 17 but makes it clear the son has to have the same Honour.And in John 10 v 30 it’s clear what he his saying he is saying he and the father have not only the same purpose of looking after the sheep but for making himself as God just because he does not say I AM GOD in this passage doesn’t mean it’s not implied “I am Married” but I can say “that’s my wife” or “she is my other half”, not the best example but you get my drift.
Right this one will have the Witnesses automatically jumping on the bandwagon and shouting about how translations like the N.I.V and The New English Bible, and the Catholic Jerusalem Bible, don’t have these Verses and that is why I mentioned the Alexandrians previously as most and “I mean most” Bibles nowadays are from the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus first I must say that the Sinaiticus to me is a 100% forgery just so happens Constantin Tischendorf a leading Bible scholar of the 1800s was sent out to find other Translations to rival the Textus Receptus and if you believe a chance finding of Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest New Testament manuscript, was found at St. Catherine’s Monastery in the Sinai when he went looking for an old manuscript to rival Textus Receptus Well more fool on you..!!! more on this at What Is The Bible…?
Anyway these Manuscripts the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are from the Alexandrian Text and that is what the New world translation relied on and are Corrupt from the Start as Origen was a Gnostic a Jehovah of his day and being a textual critic, is supposed to have corrected numerous portions of the sacred manuscripts. Evidence to the contrary shows he changed them to agree with his own human philosophy of mystical and allegorical ideas. With Origen in the region of over 200 scriptures removed and butchered and that’s Just like the Jehovah’s changing the text to suit their beliefs. I have heard some people saying that Origen was not a Gnostic I have found over the years reading about him that to be wrong. Origen taught that the Lord Jesus Christ is a created being who did not have eternal existence as God.And you will find this on pages 900-902, Vol. 16, of the 1936 edition Encyclopedia Britannica.
Scriptures that have Been Altered and removed.( not an exhaustive list) Commentary under Verse Taken from appendix 2, III: “O Biblios The Book,” by Allan O’Reilly
But this kind goes not out but by prayer and fasting. Matthew 17 v 21
omitted by NWT
Burgon (14) p 91, 206 states that every extant uncial except Aleph and B and every extant cursive except one contain the verse. Of the versions, the Old Latin, Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Georgian, Ethiopic and Slavonic attest to the verse, with only the Curetonian Syriac and Sahidic omitting it. He cites additional ancient authorities including 2nd Century: Tertullian; 3rd Century: Origen; 4th Century: Ambrose, Athanasius, Augustine, Basil, Chrysostom, Hilary, Juvencus; 8th Century: Clement of Syria, John Damascene.
Burgon also cites the Syriac version of the Canons of Eusebius and the readings of the entire Eastern Church on the l0th Sunday after Pentecost from the earliest period, in favour of the verse. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage
For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. Matthew 18 v 11
Burgon (14) p 92, states that the verse is attested by every known uncial except Aleph, B, L and every known cursive except three. Also bearing witness to the verse are the Old Latin, Peshitta, Curetonian and Philoxenian Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, Georgian and Slavonic versions. Of the fathers citing the verse, Burgon lists 2nd Century: Tertullian; 3rd Century: Origen; 4th Century: Ambrose, Augustine, Chrysostom, pope Damasus, Hilary, Jerome, Theodorus Heracl.
Burgon adds that the verse was read in the Universal Eastern Church on the day following Pentecost, from the beginning. Berry’s Greek text also contains the verse.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. Matthew 23 v 14
omitted by NWT
Ruckman (2) p 102, (54) p 15, “states that the omission can be traced to Origen”, whose influence is responsible for the omission of the verse in the Alexandrian manuscripts. Berry’s Greek text contains verse 14, although transposing it with verse 13.
If any man have ears to hear, let him hear. Mark 7 v 16
omitted by NWT
Ruckman (54) p 16, cites D (6th Century), Tatian’s Diatessaron (180 AD) and the Gothic version of Ulfilas (320 AD) as the earliest authorities for this verse. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. Mark 9 v 44
Omitted by NWT
Ruckman (2) p 122, states that A, D, K, X, Theta, Pi and the majority of Receptus Greek manuscripts support this passage. “The verses were omitted in the manuscripts of Origen” and Eusebius (i.e. Aleph and B). Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors. Mark 15 v 28
Omitted by NWT
Ruckman (2) p 110, (54) p 18, states that the verse is found in the vast majority of manuscripts and in the Old Latin and Old Syriac of the 2nd and 3rd centuries respectively. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils. And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept And they when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed notAfter that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them. Afterwards, he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be damned.And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover. So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven and sat on the right hand of God.And they went forth and preached everywhere the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen. Mark 16 v 9-20
The NWT includes in its text the following, which other versions, e.g. RSV, NASV, retain the margin:
“And they delivered all these instructions briefly to Peter and his companions. Afterwards, Jesus himself sent out by them from east to west the sacred and imperishable message of eternal salvation.”
NWT has verses 9-20 as a “long conclusion,” indicating that manuscripts A, C, D include it, while Aleph, B, the Syriac and Armenian versions omit them.
The evidence in favour of the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20 is overwhelming. The TBS publication (58) “The Authenticity of The Last Twelve Verses of…Mark” is an excellent summary, drawing mainly from Burgon, (14) p 36-40, 422-4 and Burgon’s work cited by Fuller (33) p 25-130. See also Burton (5) p 62-3, Fuller (4) p 168-9, Hills (3) p 161-2, (38) p 133-4, Ruckman (2) p 132.
The TBS publication-see above-states that only 2 Greek manuscripts (Aleph and B) out of a total of 620 which contain the Gospel of Mark, omit the verses. See Burgon, cited by Fuller (33) p 60-1. Moreover, Burgon, ibid p 67, states that a blank space has been left in B, where the verses should have been but where the scribe obviously omitted them.
As further evidence in favour of the verses, Burgon (14) p423, (3) p 169, cites: 2nd Century: Old Latin and Peshitta Syriac versions, Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian; 3rd Century: Coptic and Sahidic versions, Hippolytus, Vincentius, ‘Acta Pilati’-by an unknown author, Apostolic Constitutions; 4th Century: Curetonian Syriac and Gothic versions, Syriac table of Canons, Eusebius, Macarius Magnes, Aphraates, Didymus, The Syriac “Acts of the Apostles,” Epiphanius, Leontius, Ephraim, Ambrose, Chrysostom, Jerome, Augustine; 5th Century: Armenian version (some copies), Codices A and C, Leo, Nestorius, Cyril of Alexandria, Victor of Antioch, Patricius, Marius Mercator; 6th and 7th Centuries: Codex D, Georgian and Ethiopic versions, Hesychius, Gregentius, Prosper, Archbishop John of Thessalonica, Bishop Modestus of Jerusalem.
The TBS also cites the Philoxenian Syriac of the 5th century as containing the verses. Hills and Ruckman also cite Tatian (2nd century) as quoting the verses. Hills (3) p 162, (38) p 134, states that besides Aleph and B, the Sinaitic Syriac-from the same source as Aleph, 2 manuscripts of the Georgian version and 62 of the Armenian version omit the verses. The Old Latin manuscript k has the “short conclusion” instead of verses 9-20. See notes for NEB, NWT. Burgon (33) p 81-2, explains how this short ending has been obtained solely from Codex L, an 8th or 9th-century manuscript “with an exceedingly vicious text” (ibid). Hills explains the omission of verses 9-20 from the above handful of documents as indicative of the work of heretics, especially docetists who sought to de-emphasise post-resurrection appearances of the Lord from the Gospel record, ibid p 166-8, p 138-41.
Burgon (33) p 49-60 also demonstrated that the supposed adverse testimony of ancient writers is spurious, resting on a quotation from Eusebius which does NOT deny verses 9-20. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
Let’s take a look at the two “oldest and best” manuscripts that delete the last twelve verses of Mark 16. The Vaticanus (Codex B) and Sinaiticus (Codex Aleph):
The Vatican copy stops short at the end of Mark 16, verse eight. But the copiest left a blank space sufficient to accommodate the twelve missing verses! This is the only vacant column in the whole Vaticanus manuscript! It seems that the copyist knew that there was a portion missing in the copy before him. Dean John William Burgon draws the obvious conclusion that the scribe who prepared Vaticanus “was instructed to leave them out, and he obeyed, but he prudently left a blank space in memoriam rei. Never was blank more intelligible! Never was silence more eloquent!” (op. cit., p. 67, “Last Twelve Verses of St. Mark,” 1871).
As for the Sinaiticus manuscript, it is written in the same-size letters throughout until you come to the place where the last twelve verses of Mark belong, then the letters become large and spread out, taking up enough extra space to allow the last twelve verses of Mark to appear in the smaller letters that had been used up until this time. The double page containing the end of Mark and the beginning of Luke was removed at an early date and replaced with the four sides rewritten to exclude Mark 16:9-21! By slightly increasing the size of the letters and spaces, the writer was able to extend his shortened version to the top of the column preceding Luke one. Tischendorf, the discoverer of the Sinaiticus copy, alleged that these pages were written by the copyists of the Vaticanus manuscript.
So much for the so-called evidence from the two “oldest” manuscripts; if anything they testify to the authenticity of the last twelve verses of Mark.
And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. Luke 1 v 28
“blessed art thou among women” Omitted by NWT
Ruckman (54) p 18, states that the words are found in all four families of manuscripts and indicates they were quoted 170 years before the appearance of Aleph and B. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Luke 17 v 36
Hills (3) p 221, (38) p 208, states that the verse is lacking in the editions of Erasmus, in the first three editions of Stephanus and in the majority of manuscripts. Hence it is not found in Berry’s Greek text. The verse is found in the 4th edition of Stephanus, in the editions of Beza and Elzevir, in D, the Latin Vulgate, the Peshitta, Curetonian and Sinaitic Syriac. That the verse merits inclusion in Luke is demonstrated by the cross reference, Matthew 24:40.
Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment and cast lots. Luke 23 v 34
“Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do”
double bracketed by the NWT. questioned in the margins. Burgon (14) p 83-5, states that the words are found in every known uncial except B, D, in every known cursive except 38, 435, a, b, d and in every ancient version except one of the Egyptian texts. Burgon also cites 2nd Century: Hegesippus, Irenaeus; 3rd Century: Apostolic Constitutions, Clementine Homilies, disputation of Archelaus with Manes, Hippolytus, Origen, Tatian; 4th: Century: Acta Apostt. (Syrian Acts of the Apostles), Acta Philippi, Acta Pilati, Ambrose, Athanasius, Augustine, Basil, Chrysostom, Dionysius Areopagus, Ephraem Syrus, Ephraim, Eusebius, Gregory Nyssa, Hilary, Ignatius (c), Jerome, Justin Martyr (c), Theodorus; 5th Century: Cyril of Alexandria, Eutherius, Theodoret; 6th Century: Anastasius Sinaita, Hesychius; 7th Century: Andreas Cretensis, Antiochus the monk, Maximus; 8th Century: Amphilochius (c), Chrysostom (c), John Damascene. See also Fuller (32) p 139. Hills (3) p 132, (38) p 74, states that the words are omitted by Papyrus 75, B, D, W, Theta, 38, 435, some copies of the Old Latin, the Sinaitic Syriac and the Coptic versions but retained by the vast majority of Greek manuscripts, including Aleph, A, C, L, N, certain manuscripts of the Old Latin, the Curetonian, Peshitta, Hardean and Philoxenian Syriac. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had. John 5 v 4
Omitted by NWT
Verse 4 is omitted by Papyrii 66, 75, uncials Aleph, B, C*, D, W supp, 0125, 0141, cursive 33, Old Latin d, f, 1, q, Curetonian Syriac, some manuscripts of the Coptic-Sahidic-Bohairic versions, the Georgian and Latin Vulgate versions. Verse 4 is found (with variations) in uncials A, C3, K, L, Pi, X comm, Delta, Theta, Psi, 047, 063, 078, cursives 28, 565, 700, 892, 1009, 1010, 1071, 1079, 1195, 1216, 1230, 1241, 1242, 1253, 1344, 1365, 1546, 1646,2148, 2174, Byzantine majority text and Lectionaries, Old Latin a (4th c), aur (7th), b (5th), c (12/13th), e (5th), f12 (5th),j (6th), rl (7th), the Syriac (Harkelian, Peshitta, Philoxenian, 3rd- 7th c), some manuscripts of the Coptic-Bohairic, the Armenian version; Diatessaron a, e arm, 1, n; Tertullian (220 AD), Ambrose (397 AD), Didymus (398 AD), Chrysostom (407 AD), Cyril (444 AD).
Ruckman (2) p 217, states that the Diatessaron copies (2nd century) attesting to the passage number over 200. Ruckman, ibid and Hills (3) p 146, (38) p 122, state that the passage is virtually intact in the vast majority of Greek manuscripts. See Fuller (33) p 157-8. Berry’s Greek text supports this passage.
Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? John 9 v 35
“SON OF GOD” has been altered to “Son of Man” by the NWT
Hills (3) p 136-7, (38) p 76, states that the AV1611 is supported by the Traditional Text (see Berry) and the Old Latin. The modern reading is derived from Papyri 66 and 75, Aleph, B, D, and the Sinaitic Syriac and probably represents an attack on the Deity of Christ by heretics. Ruckman (54) p 31. states that this passage reading is cited by Origen (200 AD) and Tertullian (220 AD) and found in Ulfilas’ Gothic Bible (330 AD).
I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. John 10 v 14-15
“and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me”, has been altered to “my sheep know me just as the Father knows me” or similar wording is condoned in the margins of the NWT
The objection to the modern rendering is that it equates the knowledge of the Lord by the believer to that which is enjoyed by the Father. The result is either to deify man or humanize God, either tendency being heresy.
Burgon (14) p 220-1, states that the proportion of manuscripts of John which support this passage is “996 out of 1000.” He states that the modern reading-unquestionably the work of heretics-is found only in Aleph, B, D, L. this passage is also supported by the Syriac, Chrysostom, Gregory of Nazianzus, Macarius (4th century), Cyril of Alexandria, Theodoret (5th century) and Maximus (7th century). See also Fuller (32) p 158-9. Ruckman (31) p418, cites only Aleph, B, D, L as against this passage and A, Theta, E, F, K, M, P, Phi, Sigma, Delta in support. Berry’s Greek text supports the AV1611.
I’ll Stop there I’ve given a few from each of the Gospels that the NWT Changes to suit their doctrine and obstruct the deity of Christ to omitted Verses completely The NWT is a corrupt Version as I’ve already said 47 + scriptures been removed and countless changes been made.
One more thing before I finish is the Witnesses have never been ones to shy away from their own Prophecies of their coming ” Golden Age” and they say they are still learning but how many failed blunders does it take for you not to trust them I know in 1975 with the failed prophecy caused many to leave and those that did never left to fill the seats in the local churches they left with the scent of Religion in their nostrils are became what we would say are the religiously abused.
- 1897 “Our Lord, the appointed King, is now present, since October 1874,” (Studies in the Scriptures, vol. 4, p. 621).
- 1899 ” . . . the ‘battle of the great day of God Almighty'( Revelation 16 v 14), which will end in A.D. 1914 with the complete overthrow of earth’s present rulership, is already commenced,” (The Time Is at Hand, 1908 edition, p. 101).
- 1916 “The Bible chronology herein presented shows that the six great 1000 year days beginning with Adam are ended, and that the great 7th Day, the 1000 years of Christ’s Reign, began in 1873,” (The Time Is at Hand, forward, p. ii).
- 1918 “Therefore we may confidently expect that 1925 will mark the return of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the faithful prophets of old, particularly those named by the Apostle in Hebrews 11, to the condition of human perfection,” (Millions Now Living Will Never Die, p. 89).
- 1922 “The date 1925 is even more distinctly indicated by the Scriptures than 1914,” (Watchtower, Sept. 1, 1922, p. 262).
- 1923 “Our thought is, that 1925 is definitely settled by the Scriptures. As to Noah, the Christian now has much more upon which to base his faith than Noah had upon which to base his faith in a coming deluge,” (Watchtower, Apr. 1, 1923, p. 106).
- 1925 “The year 1925 is here. With great expectation Christians have looked forward to this year. Many have confidently expected that all members of the body of Christ will be changed to heavenly glory during this year. This may be accomplished. It may not be. In his own due time God will accomplish his purposes concerning his people. Christians should not be so deeply concerned about what may transpire this year,” (Watchtower, Jan. 1, 1925, p. 3).
- 1925 “It is to be expected that Satan will try to inject into the minds of the consecrated, the thought that 1925 should see an end to the work,” (Watchtower, Sept., 1925, p. 262).
- 1926 “Some anticipated that the work would end in 1925, but the Lord did not state so. The difficulty was that the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason; and that when their imaginations burst asunder, they were inclined to throw away everything,” (Watchtower, p. 232).
- 1931 “There was a measure of disappointment on the part of Jehovah’s faithful ones on earth concerning the years 1917, 1918, and 1925, which disappointment lasted for a time . . . and they also learned to quit fixing dates,” (Vindication, p. 338).
- 1941 “Receiving the gift, the marching children clasped it to them, not a toy or plaything for idle pleasure, but the Lord’s provided instrument for most effective work in the remaining months before Armageddon,” (Watchtower, Sept. 15, 1941, p. 288).
- 1968 “True, there have been those in times past who predicted an ‘end to the world’, even announcing a specific date. Yet nothing happened. The ‘end’ did not come. They were guilty of false prophesying. Why? What was missing? . . . Missing from such people were God’s truths and evidence that he was using and guiding them,” (Awake, Oct. 8, 1968).
- 1968 “Why are you looking forward to 1975?” (Watchtower, Aug. 15, 1968, p. 494).
This List was taken from carm.Org
Let’s have a wee recap shall we So we have a group that was started by a man who was an avid fan of the eastern Practices that would putBlavatskyy to shame.A man who changed scripture to suit his ideologies like Origen who communed with Fallen Angels used Freemason Symbols although he claims not to be one. Bearing in mind he is from the Illuminati Bloodlines family of ” Russel” and he is Nephew of the man who was responsible for the skull and bone society.
Funded by the Luciferin Rothschilds they also have a select board who dictate what the meaning of scripture says and means and you would be shunned for reading any other books. Never the less at the same time you read a book that was dictated by a medium via a fallen Angel the book “Angels and woman”. Then you have his Replacement a man who changed some of the Original doctrines to back the Elites mindset of Eugenics. A man who continued to follow in the footsteps of contacting the Fallen Angels and Demons a man who thinks God is an organism living in the Pleiades.
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2 John 1 v 7
A group who deny the deity of Jesus Christ who deny that God and Christ are one and not forgetting the holy spirit who is equal also who they demote not only his Godhood but personhood also and referred to him as a force. A group who Deny the Occult but Bury their founder under a Pyramid with the stamp of watchtower on it but lets be exact hear although Charles T Russel started the Movement it was Rutherford who really birthed the modern Jehovah witnesses with stamping his mark with some doctrinal changes and a move away from a zionist stand but all this was in line from the Rothschilds to have the Jews demonised so they could all the more win the sympathy for the Land in Isreal the name Jehovah’s witness arrived to stay in 1931.
Once again I thank you for the pleasure of your eyes for the duration whether you read from the opening word to these last few words or scanned for the juicy bits I hope you have learned something to equip you in your next meeting with the cult of the Jehovah witnesses if you want to see how a convo went for me go here Witness the Witnesses. there is some added info like the Origin of the Name Jehovah I think I’ve written enough but hopefully not too long for you the reader. If you have had an experience that you feel others would learn from please comment and if you left with anything new let me know like and subscribe Go Bless.
King James Bible
O Biblios The Book by Allan O’Reilly